Meritocracy in the Selection of Senior Physical Education Managers in the Ministry of Education
Keywords:
Meritocracy, Senior Managers, Physical Education, Ministry of EducationAbstract
The objective of this study was to identify the factors affecting the merit-based selection of senior physical education managers in the national Ministry of Education. The present study was mixed-methods research (qualitative–quantitative) with an exploratory approach. The statistical population in the qualitative phase consisted of all experts in the research field (senior physical education managers of the Ministry of Education, faculty members familiar with the research literature, and specialists), while the quantitative phase included physical education managers and teachers in metropolitan areas of the country. The statistical sample in the qualitative phase consisted of 18 experts selected until theoretical saturation was achieved using purposive theoretical sampling and snowball sampling techniques. In the quantitative phase, considering that 5 to 10 samples were required for each item, a total of 384 individuals constituted the statistical sample. The data collection instruments included a semi-structured interview in the qualitative phase and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative phase. Content validity was assessed based on expert opinions, and construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses), composite reliability indices, Cronbach’s alpha, divergent and convergent validity, and structural equation modeling were employed. The model fit index was reported as GOF = 0.43. Finally, eight factors were identified: merit-oriented governance, professional ethics in power, transformational leadership in physical education, structural justice in access to opportunities, commitment to educational–health missions, professional autonomy in decision-making, intelligent resource management, and the organizational–cultural identity of managers. Therefore, the development and implementation of a “transparent system for managerial evaluation and appointment” based on objective merit indicators (such as professional competence, ethical commitment, and resource management capability), along with continuous supervision by independent monitoring bodies to prevent the influence of informal networks, is recommended.
Downloads
References
Bailey, R., Hillman, C. H., Arent, S., & Petitpas, A. (2021). The impact of physical activity on the cognitive and academic performance of children and adolescents: A review of meta-analytic evidence. Educational psychology review, 33(1), 1-23.
Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020310265
Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2020). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238
Collinson, V. (2023). Competency-based leadership models in educational contexts: A global perspective. School Leadership & Management, 43(2), 112-129.
Culver, D. M., & Trudel, P. (2020). Transforming coaching practices through reflective practice and collaborative learning. International Sport Coaching Journal, 7(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2019-0035
Day, C., Gu, Q., Sammons, P., & Pan, H. (2022). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Evidence from a global perspective. School effectiveness and school improvement, 33(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.2018340
Diefenbach, T. (2020). Meritocracy and leadership selection: Challenges for public administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 672-686.
Ferguson, K. A., McLennan, K. L., & Cote, J. (2021). Mission-driven leadership in physical education: Fostering holistic student development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(3), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0271
Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TyCrXUQJ4VkC&oi=fnd&pg=PP15&dq=Fraser,+N.+(2009).+Scales+of+justice:+Reimagining+political+space+in+a+globalizing+world,+Columbia+University+Press.
Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin Press. https://michaelfullan.ca/books/coherence-right-drivers-action-schools-districts-systems/
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & Schechter, C. (2020). The moral imperative realized. Corwin Press. https://michaelfullan.ca/books/moral-imperative-realized/
Harris, A. (2021). Ethical leadership in schools: Creating a culture of integrity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 412-427. https://doi.org/1001718120915312
Kim, J. (2025). Economic implications of merit-based management in school sports. Applied Sport Economics, 19(4), 301-318.
Leithwood, K., & Azah, V. (2024). How leadership influences student learning: The role of school leaders in improving teaching and learning. School effectiveness and school improvement, 32(2), 234-252.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Lubans, D. R., Ng, J. Y. Y., Plotnikoff, R. C., & Lubans, N. (2020). The effects of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: An updated systematic review. Sports medicine, 50(1), 1-18.
Marin, M., & Minguez, R. (2022). Meritocracy in educational leadership: Evidence from OECD countries. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 512-529.
Moos, L., & Aase, M. (2021). Resource leadership in Nordic schools: Balancing professional values and system demands. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220938451
Morgan, A. (2023). Impact of managerial competence on school sports program quality. International Journal of Sport Management, 28(1), 45-62.
Rezapour, F., Moharramzadeh, M., Azizian Kohan, N., & Naghizadeh Baghi, A. (2024). Talent management model for meritocracy of managers and leaders in sports organizations. Sport Management Journal, 4(67), 15-35. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_92909.html
Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What's become of the common good? Farrar, Straus and Giroux. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361684621_Sandel_MJ_2020_The_Tyranny_of_Merit_What's_Become_of_the_Common_Good_Farrar_Straus_and_Giroux
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DlGhlT34jCUC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Schein,+E.+H.+(2010).+Organizational+culture+and+leadership,+Jossey-Bass.
Van Dijk, H. (2020). The paradox of meritocracy. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 773-785. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254078545_The_Paradox_of_Meritocracy_in_Organizations
Yamamoto, K. (2024). Competency models for talent acquisition in sports management. Human Resource Management in Sport Research, 12(3), 214-230.
Yarmohammadi Monfared, S., Naghizadeh Baghi, A., Moharramzadeh, M., & Azizian Kohan, N. (2024). Optimal management of sports organizations with a meritocracy approach. Public Management Perspective, 15(3), 82-103. https://jpap.sbu.ac.ir/article/view/13460/article_104764.html
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anahita Sadeghi Niyarki (Author); Mokhtar Nasiri Farsani; Mehdi Naderi Nasab (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
