Identifying Key Drivers Influencing the Future of Humanitarian Marketing in Companies Active in Green Products

Authors

    Seyed Shahabaldin Tabatabaei Department of Managment, Kish International Branch Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran
    Alireza Rousta * Department of Business Management, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Alirezarouta@yahoo.com
    Farzad Asayesh Department of Business Management, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran
    Mahmood Ahmadi sharif Department of Business Management, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Humanitarian marketing, green products, thematic analysis, customer rights, strategic philanthropy

Abstract

This study aims to identify and thematically model the key drivers influencing the future trajectory of humanitarian marketing in companies engaged in green product development. This qualitative exploratory study utilized semi-structured interviews with 12 purposively and theoretically sampled experts in green and humanitarian marketing. Participants were selected based on academic rank, expertise in sustainability, and familiarity with content analysis. Data collection was informed by a prior literature review (2020–2024) and evaluated using a 10-item critical appraisal checklist. Interviews transitioned from unstructured to semi-structured formats to ensure thematic emergence. Thematic analysis followed a three-level coding process (open, axial, selective), resulting in 315 codes, 32 basic themes, 6 organizing themes, and 3 global themes. MAXQDA software was used for coding. Reliability of themes was confirmed via Fuzzy Delphi analysis, applying triangular fuzzy numbers and a defuzzified mean threshold of 0.70. Thematic analysis revealed three global dimensions—individual rights, institutional rights, and social rights of customers—governing humanitarian marketing in green product firms. The “social rights” dimension, encompassing green norm internalization and legitimacy, had the highest frequency (35.55%), followed by institutional rights (32.69%) and individual rights (31.76%). The most robust theme in the Delphi analysis was “Green Customer Solidarity” (mean = 0.79), affirming stakeholder involvement as a key future driver. Themes highlighted include green value cognition, eco-symbolism, legal compliance, trust-building, societal equity, and participatory marketing. Humanitarian marketing in green product contexts is evolving into a multidimensional rights-based framework that requires alignment between ethical narratives, customer values, and institutional accountability. Future success hinges on firms’ ability to integrate cognitive, legal, and societal imperatives while ensuring cultural coherence, technological readiness, and stakeholder engagement.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, O., Osmanaj, V., Kwiatek, P., Alryalat, M., Chimhundu, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). The impact of technological innovation on marketing: individuals, organizations and environment: a systematic review. Economic Research, 36(3), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2210661

Amirhosari, S., Ammari, H., Gharahbeyglou, H., & Bodaghi, H. (2021). Investigating the moderating effect of manager's ethical activities on altruistic marketing in Islamic business. Business Management, 13(50), 65-84.

Arco-Castro, M. L., Lopez-Pérez, M. V., Rodriguez-Gomez, S., & Garde-Sánchez, R. (2020). Do Stakeholders Modulate Philanthropic Strategy? Corporate Philanthropy as Stakeholders' Engagement. Sustainability, 12(18), 42-72. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187242

Bagheri Gharah Bolagh, H., & Mohammadi, F. (2024). Investigating the role of green innovativeness in shaping consumer attitudes towards environmentally friendly products. Quarterly Journal of Health and Environment, 17(1), 163-180.

Barsky, J. D., & Dvorak, M. (2015). Philanthropy as a Cost Effective Marketing Tool. In J. D. Lindquist (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1984 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16973-6_81

Bhatti, H. Y., Galan-Ladero, M. M., & Galera-Casquet, C. (2022). Cause-related marketing: a systematic review of the literature. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 20(3), 25-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00326-y

Bradu, P., Biswas, A., & Nair, C. (2023). Recent advances in green technology and Industrial Revolution 4.0 for a sustainable future. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 124-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20024-4

Byambadalai, U., Ma, C. A., & Wiesen, D. (2023). Changing preferences: An experiment and estimation of market-incentive effects on altruism. Journal of Health Economics, 92(1), 181-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102808

Chen, Z., & Huang, Y. (2016). Cause-related marketing is not always less favorable than corporate philanthropy: The moderating role of self-construal. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(4), 868-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.03.003

De Costa, F. (2017). Understanding the Influence of Philanthropic Marketing and Online Generated Content on Investors' Brand Loyalty

Gotteland, D., Shock, J., & Sarin, S. (2020). Strategic orientations, marketing proactivity and firm market performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 91(3), 610-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.012

Greenspan, I., Handy, F., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2012). Environmental Philanthropy: Is It Similar to Other Types of Environmental Behavior? Organization & Environment, 25(2), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612449339

Hui, Z., & Wenan, H. (2022). Egoism or Altruism? The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Customers' Extra-Role Behavior. Organizational Psychology, 13(1), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799336

Leach, M., Reyers, B., & Bai, X. (2018). Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social-ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Global Sustainability, 2(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2018.12

Léo, T., & Élisabeth, R. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Corporate Philanthropy on Brand Authenticity in the Luxury Industry: Scale Development and Empirical Studies. Sustainability, 15(16), 122-154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612274

Liket, K., & Maas, K. (2015). Strategic Philanthropy: Corporate Measurement of Philanthropic Impacts as a Requirement for a "Happy Marriage" of Business and Society. Business & Society, 55(6), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650314565356

Lopes, J. M., Bairrada, C. M., & de Matos Coelho, A. F. (2023). Perceived altruism in cause-related marketing. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-023-00379-1

Mansoor, M., & Paul, J. (2022). Consumers' choice behavior: An interactive effect of expected eudaimonic well-being and green altruism. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2876

Mehta, N. K., Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Pandey, N. (2022). Empirical investigation regarding ethical decision making: a stakeholder cross-impact analysis (SCIA). International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(3), 444-464. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-07-2021-0149

Mohammad Salehi, F., Rousta, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2023). Evaluating the effects of altruistic value, environmental awareness, and social media on green purchasing behavior with the mediating role of normative goals and environmental concern. Environmental Science and Technology, 25(3), 103-122.

Panda, T. K., Kunar, A., Jakhar, S., & Luthra, S. (2019). Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers' altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243(3), 118-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575

Perdomo, J. (2023). The rights of future generations from the perspective of Sustainable Wellbeing

Plant, K., Barac, K., & De Jager, H. (2017). Developing early career professional auditors at work: what are the Determinants of success? Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(3), 368-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2017-0119

Semenov, A. V., & Randrianasolo, A. (2024). The moderating role of national philanthropic environment in the relationship between advertising intensity and corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Advertising, 42(6), 1065-1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2128567

Sharma, P., Ueno, A., Dennis, C., & Turan, C. P. (2023). Emerging digital technologies and consumer decision-making in retail sector: Towards an integrative conceptual framework. Computers in human Behavior, 148(3), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107913

Shetty, S., Chaudhuri, M. S., & Shetty, A. (2021). The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Millennials' Purchase Intentions: Evidence of CSR from an Emerging Economy. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 23(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.55069

Singh, A., & Pathak, G. S. (2023). First three decades of cause-related marketing: building a deeper understanding through bibliometric analysis. Journal of Management History, 29(4), 582-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-11-2022-0067

Tsui-Hsu Tsai, T., Jing Lin, A., & Y. Li, E. (2014). The effect of philanthropic marketing on brand resonance and consumer satisfaction of CSR performance: Does media self-regulation matter? Chinese Management Studies, 8(3), 527-547. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2014-0074

Valian, H., Koushki Jahromi, A., & Arouee, M. (2019). Designing an empowerment inertia model for human resources in the Roads and Urban Development Department of Golestan Province. Human Resource Management Research, 11(4), 39-83.

Wang, K., Yu, N., Ma, Y., & Tang, Y. (2023). Environmental regulation and corporate philanthropy: Evidence and mechanism from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 66(23), 176-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102046

Yu, H. C. (2020). Corporate philanthropic giving and sustainable development. Journal of Management Development, 39(7/8), 837-849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2019-0479

Zandinassab, M., & Kimasi, M. (2022). Bibliometric analysis and literature review of philanthropic marketing. Quarterly Journal of Management Research in Iran, 26(3), 145-171.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-01

Submitted

2024-11-24

Revised

2025-02-22

Accepted

2025-02-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tabatabaei , S. S. ., Rousta, A. ., Asayesh , F. ., & Ahmadi sharif , M. . (2025). Identifying Key Drivers Influencing the Future of Humanitarian Marketing in Companies Active in Green Products. Journal of Foresight and Health Governance, 2(1), 62-70. https://www.journalfhg.com/index.php/jfph/article/view/26

Similar Articles

1-10 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.